“If I have seen further, it is by standing on the shoulders of giants.” -- Isaac Newton
Posted by: Toadsly
on Oct 09, 2011
Back in the day, when my sister, Aimee, was a Harvard undergraduate student, I’d travel to Cambridge at least once each semester, usually accompanied by my wife and parents. I’d, whenever possible, sign up for a continuing education course at the “New College” along the Charles River to help defray some of the trip’s expenditures, since various costs associated with continuing education were tax deductible. (Also, it was quite cool to inform my colleagues at professional meetings that I’d recently learned this or that at Harvard. I was so full of shit in those days I still stink a little, as evidenced by this post!) Over the four years, I got to meet Aimee’s college buddies, and one of them was an interesting character named Saul. I don’t think I ever knew his last name. Saul majored in physics; my sister in biology. After they graduated, Saul matriculated to UC Berkeley where he earned his PhD. Aimee and Saul kept in touch.
Occasionally, over the past 30 years, Aimee would tell me Saul received this award or was given that honor. Saul was a preeminent astrophysicist, and even appeared on a PBS Scientific American Frontiers program hosted by Alan Alda. I never saw it. I suppose my sister kept me informed about Saul because I’m an amateur astronomer, and she assumed I’d be interested.
A few days ago, I got an unexpected call from Sis. She said, “Isn’t wonderful about Saul?” “Saul?” said I. “Saul Perlmutter! He just won the Nobel Prize in physics!”
Perlmutter, who heads a group of physicists and astronomers called the Supernova Cosmology Project, along with Adam Riess and Brian Schmidt (two members of the competing High-Z Supernova Search team) will split the $1.5 million Swedish reward – Perlmutter 50%; Reiss & Schmidt, 25% each.
These three Nobel Laureates discovered in 1998 that a mysterious force now called “dark energy” has been pushing the universe apart for billions of years at an ever-increasing speed. By studying distant exploding stars called Type1a supernovae, which give off a constant amount of brilliant light when they destruct, for six years and interpreting the data amassed, it was apparent an unknown antigravity force was responsible for the unexpectedly fast expansion of the universe. Calculations suggest “dark energy” makes up 73% the universe. Another unknown entity, “dark matter,” comprises 23% of the universe. Only 4% is occupied by the objects we think of as tangible – namely, galaxies and stars and planets.
Some experts call “dark energy” the most profound problem in modern physics. Many explanations have been concocted to solve this riddle. Some physicists believe there is no “dark energy” and it’s just gravity acting in a way it’s not expected to act. Others suggest it might be quantum vacuum energy. (Quantum physics predicts, even in a vacuum, particles are constantly being created and destroyed, thereby producing energy.) Some even postulate there is a fourth dimension and gravity is siphoned off into it.
My favorite theory says our “infinite” universe is but one of many universes. Why is this my favorite? Because it allows me to conclude this post with a catchy, incomprehensible zinger: “We may exist in one infinity in a sea of infinities!"...I warned you that I'm full of shit!

ceejai, October 09, 2011 - 10:39 AM
Toadsly, what an interesting post! A few years ago I attended a lecture by the Harvard astrophysicist who is at the forefront of "string theory." I went in expecting to be dazzled and came away thinking he was full of s**t! Just an intuitive assessment since I am too far down the intellectual ladder to really sort it out logically.
Recently, I saw a program on a theory that is supplanting string theory. It posits that the universe is like a wafer lined up with many other wafers and while there is a lot of energy/dynamism in the system the wafers maintain their distance. As things settle down and the universe enters a phase of entropy (great word, eh) two wafers bump into one another creating a renewed "Big Bang" and the cyle of destruction and creation becomes dynamic again.
I like it!
I'm just glad we found out the universe is expanding at an accelerating pace. I was betting on expansion topping out leading to contraction and collapse. I don't mind being wrong-- I just wanted an answer. Like the guy in A Serious Man who badgers the Rabbi Marschack for answers. Hilarious.
We have seen Saturn with our fancy schmancy new telescope with computer guidance. Now I want to see Andromeda galaxy!
The best viewing so far has been the moon. We need a filter so we don't burn our eyeballs out.
Jersey Joe, October 09, 2011 - 07:26 PM
Of course I enjoyed it to the last word or I would not have had so much fun with it.
Trying to find the different named star groups is kinda like trying to understand organic chemistry.
ceejai, October 10, 2011 - 07:03 AM
Toadsly, From today's Post-Gazette. What a great paper! Light from the depths of time...
Look for Andromeda and Jupiter
Before the moon rises this weekend, try to locate M31, the Andromeda Galaxy. Andromeda is the most distant object in space visible to the unaided eye. When you observe Andromeda, you are looking at the light of billions of stars over 2 million light years away.
To locate Andromeda, first find four stars that outline the "Great Square" of Pegasus, currently angled like a large diamond halfway up the eastern sky. The star in the upper left corner of Pegasus is Alpheratz. This star is also part of the Andromeda constellation where you will see two long rows of stars. Move two stars over on the top row then up and you will see a smudge of light. That hazy smudge is the Andromeda Galaxy. If you aim your binoculars or telescope at Andromeda you should see the galaxy's oval shape.
The dazzling bright star sitting below the galaxy and within 12 degrees of the horizon is Jupiter, our current "evening star." Jupiter will reach opposition on Oct. 28.
Read more: http://www.post-gazette.com/pg...z1aNb53dND
thescarletpumpernickel, October 10, 2011 - 04:15 PM
My own 2-cent opinion is that we really don't understand gravity yet, that there is no "dark matter", but I must admit that's probably just a bias that I have because I want there to always be some new world to conquer. i.e., I would be sad if we gound a 'Theory of Everything". What would that leave us to do, but sit around and drink beer.
Anyways - very cool. Closest that I can come is establishing an e-friendship with the female mathematician who was the first person offered a Macarthur Grant. (She turned it down.)
I've been very negligent in keeping in touch w. her. Maybe you've lit a fire under my lazy ass.
ciejai - Nothing like viewing Satuirn through a telescope to get a person hooked on skywatching. I still think that a dark-skies view of the Milky Way is more awesome than even the Grand Canyon. (For me, anyway.)
Interested in observing? Maybe join the Pgh. Amateur Asrtronomers. Maybe take a trip up to Cherry Springs State Park. There's a place set-aside there for astronomers. Also (about as far) Spruuce Knob, highest point in WV.
You guys got me all excited now.
P.S. - ciejai? I think that you are referring to "M-theory". Not my area of math, unfortunately.
thescarletpumpernickel, October 10, 2011 - 04:29 PM
Let me add this: (You may already know it.)
The "Dark Energy" force that is supposed to be speeding-up the expansion of the Universe was originally postulated by Einstein (the "Cosmological Constant"), who later abandoned it, saying that it was "his greatest blunder".
Newton was a very interesting character. History's preeminent intellect, he could be misanthropic and downright nasty.
(I give him pride of place over Einstein since Newton created the mathematics necessary for his Theory of Gravitation.)
"Nature and Nature's laws lay hid in night:
God said, "Let Newton be!" and all was light."
-- Alexander Pope
"If we evolved a race of Isaac Newtons, that would not be progress. For the price Newton had to pay for being a supreme intellect was that he was incapable of friendship, love, fatherhood, and many other desirable things. As a man he was a failure; as a monster he was superb."
-- Aldous Huxley
I'm the one who's full of s**t here, Toadsly.
DigitalDan, October 10, 2011 - 06:04 PM
When I worked at the Jet Propulsion Lab in Pasadena, CA - I printed the pictures of Jupiter for the scientists and then they would go on TV to explain what was being seen in the picture. I had to laugh a couple of times when I heard a scientist say - “this can’t be!” or “this is impossible!”
I don’t think for all his supposed intelligence that man is even close to figuring out what is going on in space.
I remember a TV show where some scientists were discovering new particles in the atom. The show was trying to determine the invisible force that held the atom together which extended to the objects that contained the atoms and with space. The conclusion after about 4 hours of the continued TV show was that the force that held atoms and the universe together was “light.” My first thought was - “God is light!”
The 4th dimension is supposed to be time according to Einstein. I read this in 2 books -(1) “Relativity for the Layman” that Einstein read and said the book was accurate on the cover (2) “One, Two, Infinity” written by a Professor at a College. This book had a diagram of the 4 dimensions which I couldn't understand. But, then - I read these when I was in the 9th grade.
Like I said before, I don’t think that man even knows what he is talking about. Toadsly, your theory seems to say that darkness takes up most of space and the other scientists said that light held the universe together. It is interesting!
Also, I believe that Einstein said that space folds in on itself and bends so that you cannot travel in a straight line in space. Who knows?
God must be laughing at man trying to figure his creation out. I don’t even try. It can be fun, but -I don’t think most of us are even close.
ceejai, October 12, 2011 - 11:19 AM
Yes! One of the great performances of all time. He nailed it by neither overacting or underacting. Couldn't have been better. I loved it when Elliot asks him, "Vilma? Does my dad know, you know, what you are?" And Vilma snorts in exhasperation, replying gently "Elliot. I know what I am. That does make it easier for everyone else, doesn't it?"
That was a real actors' movie for me.

This really does not take all that smart of a guy to figure out. Being all good and all honest God revealed to us his greatest creation was the angel Lucifer.
Lucifer is the ruler of darkness.
What is not of the Light of God is in the darkness of the evil one.
Toadsly, I hope your reference to being cool and the darkness topic of your post is only coincidental.
It is easily comprehensible to know we exist in a sea of infinities of the one infinity.